As of December 1st, 2023, Brazil is leading G20, wherein one of the three priorities to be addressed is tackling climate change, with a focus on energy transition, in addition to promoting sustainable development in its economic, social and environmental dimensions[1]. At this same date, the BRPTO launched a new commission, namely: sustainability and biotechnology commission (COSBIO), which will deal, among other things, with the Green Patents Program, which focuses in expediting the examination of patent applications related to environmentally friendly inventions and consequently encouraging sustainable innovation.
The BRPTO’s Green Patents Program started in 2012, in line with the public policy to fight climate change, and became a permanent project in 2016, due to the success of having over 400 applications participating in these first four years.
By now, over a thousand applications have had their examination expedited by this fast-track alternative, significantly reducing the time to patent grant. Particularly, as can be seen below, considering the last two years, the average time between the request for participation into the Green Patents Program and the issuance of a decision by the BRPTO is of around 9 months. On the other hand, for a regular patent application, the average pendency time from the examination request to the issuance of a decision is of around 3 years and 7 months.
In addition to expediting the examination of the applications, the Green Patents Program is also an interesting way of easily identifying green technologies to be licensed and represents a real incentive for sustainable development.
To participate in this fast-track examination, the applicant must pay a specific fee and submit a request indicating which green technology their subject matter refers to with reference to a list of pre-defined technologies. As established by BRPTO’s Ordinance #79/2022, the eligible green technologies are defined in five categories: “alternative energies”, “transportation”, “energy conservation”, “waste management” and “sustainable agriculture”, which are more detailed in several subcategories, such as biofuels, electric vehicles, pollution control, alternative pesticides, among others.
The chemical and metallurgical field represents the technical field which is more engaged with the Green Patents Program, with more than 400 applications so far benefitting from expedited examination.
Despite of the high number of patent applications using the Green Patents Program, it seems that the program is not well known ot international applicants. Statistics show that more than 70% of the participants refer to Brazilian applicants, followed by American, Chinese, among others.
In comparison, that is not the same scenario for other fast-track programs, such as those related to health treatments, wherein the biggest participants are American applicants, followed by Brazilian, Swiss, British and German, among others.
Moreover, it is noted that the favorite acceleration alternative for international applicants is still the Patent Prosecution Highway program, with over 2,000 requests in the last three years. However, in view of the yearly limits imposed by the BRPTO being sooner reached (for example, in 2023, the limit was reached by early July), international applicants should consider different alternatives for avoiding the BRPTO’s delay in examining patent applications, such as the Green Patents Program.
Also, a significant requirement for the PPH program is that the patent application shall not have its examination started, i.e, after the issuance of a technical opinion by the BRPTO, it is not possible to request participation into said program anymore. The Green Patents Program, in its turn, can be required at any time during the prosecution of a patent application, including during the appeal stage.
Another advantage of the Green Patents Program compared to the PPH is the reduced costs, wherein the official fees for requesting the participation for green patents is almost half the cost involved in requesting the PPH examination.
It should be highlighted that, as any fast-track and PPH program, the Green Patents status does not guarantee the allowance of the application but makes its examination a priority in the BRPTO’s line and it is a great strategy when time is an essential factor.
[1] https://agenciabrasil.ebc.com.br/en/politica/noticia/2023-11/lula-leading-g20-brazils-top-global-responsibility (accessed on April 05, 2024)
• What changed: BRPTO; effective/dated: April 05, 2024. Particularly, as can be seen below, considering the last two years, the average time between the request for participation into the Green Patents Program and the issuance of a decision by the BRPTO is of around 9 months .• Executive impact: Implication for executives: reassess life sciences & IP posture, especially decision ownership and evidence standards across Brazil operations. .• Where to go deep: portfolio/prosecution strategy and FTO reviews. Context: However, in view of the yearly limits imposed by the BRPTO being sooner reached (for example, in 2023, the limit was reached by early July), international applicants should consider different alternatives for avoiding. • Decisions to make: risk quantification for board reporting.• Next steps: run a focused gap assessment; update playbooks/policies; and circulate a 1‑page executive memo (options, tradeoffs, timeline, residual risk, owner).
This section gives quick answers to the most common questions about this insight. What changed, why it matters, and the practical next steps. If your situation needs tailored advice, contact the RNA Law team.
Q: What changed, and why is it not “business as usual”?A: BRPTO reframes expectations in life sciences & IP. Particularly, as can be seen below, considering the last two years, the average time between the request for participation into the Green Patents Program and the issuance of a decision by the BRPTO is of around 9 months . Timing reference: April 05, 2024. Q: Which parts of the business will feel this first?A: Typically: the operational teams executing the rule (approvals/filings, product/service design, contracting) and the lines that must prove compliance under scrutiny. . Q: What is the main enforcement / dispute risk executives should manage?A: Misalignment between policy and execution plus weak documentation are the usual failure modes. However, in view of the yearly limits imposed by the BRPTO being sooner reached (for example, in 2023, the limit was reached by early July), international applicants should consider different alternatives for avoiding the BRPTO’s delay in. Set ownership, define. Q: What should we do in the next 30–90 days?A: Commission a targeted gap assessment; prioritize high-impact processes; update playbooks and controls; and issue an executive memo with options, costs, timing, and residual risk. Align Legal, Compliance, Operations, and business owners on one plan. Q: How does this affect multinational governance and cross-border consistency?A: Use the update to harmonize group minimum standards with local add-ons (Brazil-specific). Define escalation thresholds and avoid country-by-country divergence that creates inconsistent risk postures and undermines defenses.
